Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 220 5,045 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	26% Poor	Memory 41.8 1-Core 38.3 2-Core 46.7 28% 42.3 Pts	4-Core 60 8-Core 63.8 8% 61.9 Pts	64-Core 68.4 4% 68.4 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics 21,841 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2AA9) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.46% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.27 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.64 fps	MRender 0.81 Gravity 0.13 Splatting 1.04 1% 0.66 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.46% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 157 147 153 159 185 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.5% Below average	Read 136 Write 113 Mixed 122 SusWrite 159 30% 133 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 20.5 4K Mixed 16.5 48% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 38.3 55% 103 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT25664BD160BJ.C4F Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 4GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 6.5 17% 6.03 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 5.8 15% 5.37 GB/s	Latency 194 21% 194 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16