Lenovo 3364CTO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3364CTO  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3364CTO
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181016
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMay 19 '20 at 16:11
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3520M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 150
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 202
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2202) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.03% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 6.12
Parallax 3.16
4% 4.56 fps
MRender 5.57
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 8.7
5% 5.61 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.03%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 440 443 426 425 400 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 423
Write 432
Mixed 377
SusWrite 422
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 35.3
112% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 337
247% 325 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 134%
Samsung MZMPA016HMCD-000L1 16GB
15GB free
Firmware: AXM22L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 45 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 197
Write 49.1
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 45.9
20% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 9.4
37% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 91.5
DQ Write 12.3
DQ Mixed 13.6
20% 39.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 17.3
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 17.6
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3364CTO Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3364CTO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback