AZW U55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAZW U55  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW U55
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190426
Uptime5 Days
Run DateMay 17 '20 at 22:13
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 80.7
1-Core 65.1
2-Core 107
54% 84.3 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 171
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 170
11% 170 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Device(1E51 8002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
3.91% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 4.46
Parallax 5.66
4% 4.86 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 6.96
4% 5.19 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.91%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AZW-256G 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0412A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 40 51 45 48 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
57% Above average
Read 441
Write 369
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 68
50% 229 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 25.4
75% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 0.4
72% 171 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57%
Great: 86%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
362GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 137
Mixed 41
66% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
28.8% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 7.9
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical U55 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: AZW U55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback