Lenovo 2349P13

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 2349P13  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2349P13
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '20 at 03:31
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 76.6
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 104
50% 78.7 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 187
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F3) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.03% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 5.81
Parallax 3.03
4% 4.44 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.39
5% 5.51 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.03%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 172 148 130 69 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 306
Write 265
Mixed 189
SusWrite 132
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 10.6
39% 9.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 99%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
140GB free
Firmware: GH2ZB550
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 45 72 71 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 95.3
Write 20.2
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 50.7
34% 46.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
59% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 Hynix HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
53.5% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 18.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 15
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback