Dell OptiPlex GX270

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex GX270
MotherboardDell OptiPlex GX270  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20040517
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 16 '20 at 19:17
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 2.80GHz-$100
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
31.9% Below average
Memory 61
1-Core 20.1
2-Core 19.9
27% 33.7 Pts
4-Core 20.7
8-Core 19.9
3% 20.3 Pts
64-Core 19.7
1% 19.7 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Asus AH3450
Asus(1043 0028) 512MB
Driver: atidxx32.dll Ver. 8.520.0.0
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
0.75% Terrible
Lighting 0.93
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 0.53
1% 0.95 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 1.26
1% 0.84 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.75%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 36 68 54 12 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 90
Write 84.8
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 44.4
51% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 69%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB
58GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 9.9 16 15 5.6 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 29
Write 17
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 11.8
25% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.4
117% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.33 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.9 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback