Asus P5NT WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P5NT WS  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '20 at 19:00
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5450-$195
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 75
1-Core 42.8
2-Core 86
44% 67.9 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 169
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Lighting 73.3
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 92.2
60% 78 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 75
Splatting 58.2
54% 67.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 182 186 195 196 199 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60% Above average
Read 240
Write 201
Mixed 150
SusWrite 187
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 34.7
115% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 35.1
DQ Write 99.1
DQ Mixed 32.5
35% 55.6 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 60%
Great: 101%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
50GB free
Firmware: 7500
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 60 60 59 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 76.9
Write 77.9
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 59.9
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 4.3
15% 5.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 5.5
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5NT WS Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5NT WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $560
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback