EVGA 132-CK-NF79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemNVIDIA 132-CK-NF79
MotherboardEVGA 132-CK-NF79  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '20 at 17:17
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 84.5
1-Core 39.3
2-Core 78.9
46% 67.6 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 155
20% 151 Pts
64-Core 153
9% 153 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Nvidia(10DE 097A) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 37
Parallax 47.6
32% 41.4 fps
MRender 49.9
Gravity 47
Splatting 39.1
36% 45.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvidia STRIPE 298.02G 320GB
172GB free (System drive)
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 88 128 76 76 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 103
Write 100
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 84.8
61% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 4.9
16% 5.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 5.5
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 132-CK-NF79 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: EVGA 132-CK-NF79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback