Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FA_S530FA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FA_S530FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X530FA
Memory3.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190530
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateMay 16 '20 at 13:06
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8145U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 56.1
2-Core 180
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 260
36% 266 Pts
64-Core 273
17% 273 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1501) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
5.96% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 9.31
Parallax 0.09
5% 5.17 fps
MRender 8.24
Gravity 5.53
Splatting 13.5
8% 9.08 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.96%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
526GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 60 67 55 59 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 134
Write 141
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 58.6
71% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.6
212% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM2400HSB-8G 04CB AO1P24HC4R1-BUYS 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 16.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FA_S530FA Builds (Compare 142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FA_S530FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback