Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 16 '20 at 10:29
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 212
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 394
53% 395 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Zotac(19DA 1451) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 146
Parallax 134
106% 137 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 130
Splatting 107
95% 117 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 446 454 445 443 412 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 444
Mixed 357
SusWrite 433
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 98.5
4K Mixed 57.9
189% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 121%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
918GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 186 187 188 190 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 176
Mixed 83
SusWrite 186
116% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 109%
Great: 113%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
857GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 112 112 112 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 107
Write 57.3
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 111
56% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
27GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 65 62 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 57.7
Write 41.5
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 64.5
34% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1315 CT102464BA160B.C16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.9% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.2
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 19.1
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback