Asrock H55M-LE

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H55M-LE (all builds)
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101020
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 16 '20 at 10:27
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3440 6,034 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 96 1-Core 85 2-Core 170 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 426 45% 360 Pts	64-Core 430 27% 430 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Palit(1569 1187) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Lighting 34 Reflection 31.5 Parallax 40.2 28% 35.2 fps	MRender 44.4 Gravity 40.6 Splatting 36.4 33% 40.5 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Faspeed H5-30G 30GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 3GB free Firmware: P0831A SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 45 45 45 46 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 243 Write 45.6 Mixed 71.3 SusWrite 45 22% 101 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 6.9 62% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 24.4 DQ Write 45.4 DQ Mixed 8.2 14% 26 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 32%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 319GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP2OA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 93 102 109 112 105 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Read 112 Write 109 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 104 71% 96.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 74%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$79 15,506 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 229GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 45 45 45 46 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 102 Write 102 Mixed 48 SusWrite 45.1 55% 74.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 0, 0 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	46% Average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 13.1 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 13.2 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 54.1 74% 54.1 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H55M-LE Builds (Compare 342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H55M-LE

CPU
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	68x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	45x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	39x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	39x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	19x
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	14x
ARC 100 240GBOCZ $120Bench 87%, 11,799 samples	6x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	176x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	56x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $88

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16