Asrock H81 Pro BTC R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	83.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H81 Pro BTC R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140722
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	May 15 '20 at 21:40
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Memory 92.3 1-Core 108 2-Core 218 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 576 59% 479 Pts	64-Core 571 35% 571 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 2986 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 110 Parallax 91.5 87% 103 fps	MRender 91.2 Gravity 94 Splatting 95.8 77% 93.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Biostar S100-120GB 120GB 1,899 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0724S Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 382 Write 126 Mixed 136 47% 214 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 71.2 4K Mixed 16.5 89% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 32.6 DQ Mixed 16.5 29% 59.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 88%
WD WD6400AAVS-00G9B1 640GB 3,696 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 32GB free Firmware: 05.04C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 42 37 34 42 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Read 59.7 Write 59 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 39.3 37% 50.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 48%
Kingston DataTraveler SE9 USB 2.0 16GB-$5 1,670 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 15GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 4.2 4.7 4.1 4.8 4.1 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	7.55% Terrible	Read 17.8 Write 18.5 Mixed 0.3 SusWrite 5.8 13% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.2 89% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.55% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/8G 1x8GB 631 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	31.9% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 8.6 28% 9.93 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 10.4 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 63.6 63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81 Pro BTC R2.0 Builds (Compare 886 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H81 Pro BTC R2.0

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	99x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	91x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	86x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	84x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	65x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	60x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	46x
AS350 128GBApacerBench 65%, 2,222 samples	24x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	23x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	35x
78.C1GET.AU10C 1x8GBUnknownBench 31%, 186 samples	22x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $352

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16