Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120327
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '17 at 19:23
Run Duration738 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 59.1
2-Core 110
53% 83.9 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 176
25% 182 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770
Gigabyte(1458 220C) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 11
Parallax 12.7
12% 12.9 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 11.1
Splatting 12.6
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 489
Write 304
Mixed 332
83% 375 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 9.04
58% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 71.1
DQ Mixed 38
32% 43.7 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 95%
OCZ VERTEX3 60GB
5GB free
Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 409
Write 72.7
Mixed 103
42% 195 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 11.1
76% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 59.8
DQ Write 69.4
DQ Mixed 26
30% 51.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
571GB free
Firmware: SD15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 74.8
Write 65.3
Mixed 28.5
41% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.27
65% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 66%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
272GB free
Firmware: ML6OAA10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 77.9
Write 115
Mixed 67.7
65% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.3
70% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
166GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 119
Write 120
Mixed 117
89% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.48
4K Mixed 0.28
114% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 85%
Rockbox Internal Storage 4GB
3GB free, PID 74d1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.47% Terrible
Read 5.41
Write 3.47
Mixed 2.83
5% 3.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.46
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 1.01
92% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.47%
Great: 6%
Rockbox SD Card Slot 16GB
2GB free, PID 74d1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
9.6% Terrible
Read 5.54
Write 5.03
Mixed 5.04
7% 5.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.82
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 1.6
143% 2.24 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.6%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.9% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 15.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 11.8
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback