MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7977
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)  (all builds)
Memory29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '20 at 12:54
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
37.3% Below average
Memory 59.5
1-Core 25.3
2-Core 50.7
31% 45.2 Pts
4-Core 83.5
8-Core 127
13% 105 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
PowerColor(148C 2377) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1425 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.7% Below average
Lighting 32.5
Reflection 39.8
Parallax 89.1
26% 53.8 fps
MRender 72.5
Gravity 68.9
Splatting 57.9
54% 66.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
900GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 817 957 964 946 995 949 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,509
Write 1,380
Mixed 1,152
SusWrite 938
279% 1,245 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 30.5
109% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 280
207% 274 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 163%
Great: 372%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193
202GB free
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 149 170 161 162 163 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 288
Write 251
Mixed 258
SusWrite 164
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 26.2
88% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 195
152% 209 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 196 198 198 193 200 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 128
Write 179
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 196
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 93%
Great: 106%
Maxtor STM3500320AS 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: MX1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 103 104 104 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60% Above average
Read 105
Write 100
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 104
66% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 60%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$69
929GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 111 112 112 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 109
Write 110
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 111
70% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G30C15U4W.M8FE1 029E CMD16GX4M2B3000C15 859B BL8G30C15U4W.M8FE1 029E CMD16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
45.9% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 19.8
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 8.2
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) Builds (Compare 4,943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $578
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback