HP Compaq Mini 311-1000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Mini 311-1000  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3651
Memory1.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101126
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 15 '20 at 04:15
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 50%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N270
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Memory 32.3
1-Core 3.3
2-Core 5.3
12% 13.6 Pts
4-Core 5.6
8-Core 4.2
1% 4.9 Pts
64-Core 5.5
0% 5.5 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia ION LE
HP(103C 3651) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.52% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 1.69
Parallax 0.38
1% 1.01 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.52%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 64GB-$25
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X230600
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 123 82 106 108 122 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.1% Poor
Read 212
Write 142
Mixed 150
SusWrite 112
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 10.4
35% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 23.7
DQ Write 19.2
DQ Mixed 20.8
16% 21.2 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B2873EH1-C7 Kingston 99U5428-001.A00LF 3GB
1066, 1066 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.89% Terrible
MC Read 2.5
MC Write 2.3
MC Mixed 2
6% 2.27 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 0.9
3% 1.13 GB/s
Latency 242
17% 242 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Mini 311-1000 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Mini 311-1000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 10% - Terrible Total price: $42
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback