ADD TO PC
BUILD

Sony VGN-NS220TH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Sony VGN-NS220TH (all builds)
Motherboard	Sony VAIO
Memory	0.5 GB free of 3 GB
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080918
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 15 '20 at 04:12
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual T3400-$70 2,721 User benchmarks, average bench 33% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	Memory 44.5 1-Core 24.9 2-Core 48.9 26% 39.4 Pts	4-Core 48.4 8-Core 49.5 7% 49 Pts	64-Core 48.9 3% 48.9 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Sony(104D 9045) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.27% Terrible	Lighting 0.37 Reflection 0.31 Parallax 0.38 0% 0.35 fps	MRender 0.29 Gravity 0.33 Splatting 0.22 0% 0.28 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.27% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543225L9SA00 250GB-$41 1,026 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: FBEOC43C SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 13 11 13 10 4.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 38.5 Write 31 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 11.4 20% 26.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	9.1% Terrible	MC Read 2.9 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.87 GB/s	SC Read 1.3 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 2.6 6% 2.1 GB/s	Latency 182 22% 182 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.1% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback