Asus P8H67-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M LE  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 15 '20 at 03:16
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$75
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 93
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 153
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 218
29% 219 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.58
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.22 fps
MRender 1.67
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.49 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 344 370 377 373 373 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 361
Write 340
Mixed 231
SusWrite 357
73% 322 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 32.4
103% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 32.2
DQ Write 96.8
DQ Mixed 43.9
40% 57.6 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 119%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
1.5TB free, PID ab34
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 128 128 128 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
49% Average
Read 108
Write 87.2
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 128
131% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 49%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBSR2 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M LE Builds (Compare 535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $274
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback