Acer Aspire E5-476G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire E5-476G  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL AntMan_SK
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181026
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '20 at 21:31
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 184
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 272
34% 262 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX130
Acer(1025 1218) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4575
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 11.7
11% 11.9 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 13.2
Splatting 8.78
9% 11.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 256GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427ANR
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 412
Write 328
Mixed 354
81% 365 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 54.9
176% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 278
231% 333 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
256GB free
Firmware: ACM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 80.3
Write 11.8
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 10.7
22% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
74% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 04CB AM1P24HC4U1-B9RS 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
60% Above average
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.4
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 22.3
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-476G Builds (Compare 474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-476G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback