Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P9X79 PRO (all builds)
Memory	16.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140507
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	May 14 '20 at 11:02
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820 38,674 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Memory 92.9 1-Core 113 2-Core 219 81% 142 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 551 57% 459 Pts	64-Core 554 34% 554 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Gigabyte(1458 3793) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.6% Below average	Lighting 2.77 Reflection 16.3 Parallax 123 2% 47.3 fps	MRender 96.8 Gravity 135 Splatting 113 94% 115 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,243 Write 5,034 Mixed 4,969 1,136% 5,082 MB/s	4K Read 311 4K Write 203 4K Mixed 230 874% 248 MB/s	DQ Read 811 DQ Write 574 DQ Mixed 597 472% 661 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 5GB free Firmware: DXT08B0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 441 Write 110 Mixed 118 48% 223 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 75.1 4K Mixed 20.2 106% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 320 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 50.8 81% 161 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 73%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 699GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 94 99 99 99 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	64.1% Good	Read 126 Write 106 Mixed 62 SusWrite 97.4 72% 97.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 F3-1600C9-8GXM CML8GX3M2A1600C9 F3-1600C9-8GXM 24GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 28.4 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 14.3 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,416 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 53%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	544x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	386x
Core i7-4930KIntel $88Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	98x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	84x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	84x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	45x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	38x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	36x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	33x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	32x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 8x4GBKingstonBench 86%, 505 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $877

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16