Asus P8P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110310
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 13 '20 at 15:56
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 171
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 362
48% 361 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6700 Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)
Sapphire(174B E144) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.93.7.0
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
9.02% Terrible
Lighting 11.8
Reflection 9.19
Parallax 9.84
10% 10.3 fps
MRender 9.43
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 9.02%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
148GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 90 90 90 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 95
Write 88.9
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 90.3
59% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 54%
WD WD7502AAEX-00Y9A0 750GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 91 91 95 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 110
Write 99.8
Mixed 83
SusWrite 93.3
71% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-034.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.9% Below average
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback