Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory21.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '20 at 09:02
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 151
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 298
34% 268 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1212 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 32
21% 29.7 fps
MRender 30.1
Gravity 24.8
Splatting 33.9
25% 29.6 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1029A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 138 41 9.8 15 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 455
Write 367
Mixed 327
SusWrite 77.1
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.4
42% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 101%
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
103GB free
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 101 57 56 57 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 445
Write 248
Mixed 273
SusWrite 88.4
58% 264 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 26.1
119% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 160
140% 208 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBH2X04F1AA28-15 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.9% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 14.8
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback