Acer Aspire M5-481TG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire M5-481TG  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer MA41_CX
Memory6.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121113
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '17 at 11:34
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 57.7
2-Core 98.1
51% 78.7 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 164
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0713) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.15% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 5.12
Parallax 2.47
3% 3.73 fps
MRender 3.48
Gravity 2.13
Splatting 6.57
4% 4.06 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.15%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 303
Write 87.1
Mixed 155
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 5.56
46% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 13.4
DQ Write 50
DQ Mixed 5.69
12% 23 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 83%
SSD 20GB
6GB free
Firmware: S5FAM014 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 220
Write 169
Mixed 158
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 5.69
52% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 21.5
DQ Write 42.4
DQ Mixed 3.83
11% 22.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1333 Elpida EBJ20UF8BDU0-GN- 0 10GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
39.5% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M5-481TG Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5-481TG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $443
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback