Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory20.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180514
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 12 '20 at 19:44
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 255
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 702
71% 578 Pts
64-Core 696
43% 696 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.6% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 117
Parallax 122
99% 120 fps
MRender 169
Gravity 106
Splatting 94.7
97% 123 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH 128GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK10D7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 49 68 34 32 7.3 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.9% Below average
Read 65
Write 254
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 37.7
22% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 21.3
89% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 51.2
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 175
110% 119 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
500GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 136 137 137 137 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 173
Write 164
Mixed 102
SusWrite 136
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/16G Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
65.1% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 19.8
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 21.6
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H270M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback