| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H81M-D2V (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색 |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150811 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 12 '20 at 02:11 |
| Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 48% |
PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
76.8%
Very good
|
73% 123 Pts
|
48% 357 Pts
|
23% 373 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
|
52.3%
Above average
|
53% 74.6 fps
|
51% 63 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 58 63 91 92 91 MB/s
|
88%
Excellent
|
81% 364 MB/s
|
150% 54.4 MB/s
|
179% 284 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
106GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 14 15 15 9.8 MB/s
|
21.5%
Poor
|
36% 38.5 MB/s
|
61% 2.47 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
58.8%
Above average
|
58% 20.4 GB/s
|
48% 16.8 GB/s
|
64% 62.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H81M-D2V Builds (Compare 987 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-D2V - $84
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 108x |
| Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 103x |
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 86x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 68x |
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 67x |
| HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 63x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $306 |