Asus B150M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus B150M-K  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '17 at 19:03
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 217
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 327
44% 326 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.12.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 30.1
21% 28.8 fps
MRender 30.5
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 34
24% 29.3 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 128GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM02D0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 489
Write 81.4
Mixed 105
48% 225 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 16.9
106% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 75.2
DQ Mixed 44.6
74% 152 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 99%
WD WD3201ABYS-01B9A0 320GB
283GB free
Firmware: 13.01C02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 80.1
Write 67.8
Mixed 73.3
56% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.4
113% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-062.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
43.8% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B150M-K Builds (Compare 352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B150M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $168
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback