HP ProDesk 400 G4 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G4 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82A2
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180717
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 11 '20 at 13:58
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$45
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 81.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 199
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 193
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 18
16% 17.5 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 18.3
Splatting 19.4
15% 17.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HAHQ-000H1 128GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT03H3Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 444
Write 400
Mixed 356
89% 400 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 57.4
202% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 346
264% 357 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 110%
Jmicron Tech 500GB
16GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 38 39 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 39.3
Write 36.5
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 38.1
28% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 - [0xCD04] F4-3000C16-8GISB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.2% Very good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.5
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 22.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G4 SFF Builds (Compare 731 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G4 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $86
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback