Asrock M3A770DE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock M3A770DE  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '17 at 12:32
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Memory 39.4
1-Core 50.5
2-Core 68.2
32% 52.7 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 169
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
PwrHis(1787 2321) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.501.1003.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Lighting 37.4
Reflection 35.1
Parallax 50.8
30% 41.1 fps
MRender 30.7
Gravity 34.7
Splatting 40.3
29% 35.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gb0500c8 046 500GB
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPGB Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 106
Write 102
Mixed 95.8
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 0.52
4K Mixed 0.35
78% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 12.9
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 7
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 205
20% 205 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M3A770DE Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock M3A770DE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback