ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP 500-041cx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP 500-041cx (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2AE0
Memory	3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131003
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 11 '20 at 02:05
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135 10,478 User benchmarks, average bench 48% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	54.8% Above average	Memory 79.7 1-Core 61 2-Core 116 54% 85.4 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 177 24% 176 Pts	64-Core 179 11% 179 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D 10,029 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 2AE0) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	4.56% Terrible	Lighting 5.33 Reflection 8.08 Parallax 4.66 4% 6.02 fps	MRender 5.19 Gravity 4 Splatting 8.13 5% 5.77 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.56% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB 13,178 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 892GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP4OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 54 107 111 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 132 Write 132 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 92.3 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMR5040MM58F9F1600 Kingston HP655409-150-HYCG 6GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 10.8 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 9.6 23% 8.17 GB/s	Latency 81.1 49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback