HP EliteBook 745 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 745 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 221C
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '20 at 17:58
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8 PRO-7150B R5, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.8% Below average
Memory 53.7
1-Core 32.3
2-Core 60.8
32% 48.9 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 107
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
HP(103C 221C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.12.1
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
2.9% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 4.04
Parallax 5.12
3% 4.31 fps
MRender 2.76
Gravity 2.83
Splatting 3.65
3% 3.08 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.9%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon L CH-256V2S-HP 256GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2C03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 191 201 161 168 181 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 308
Write 201
Mixed 222
SusWrite 186
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 18.6
62% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 62.3
DQ Mixed 113
80% 103 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1L16BC4R1-B1PS Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.7 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4.6
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 745 G2 Builds (Compare 111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 745 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback