Biostar TZ75B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar TZ75B  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '20 at 14:18
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 95
1-Core 112
2-Core 222
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 427
56% 424 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 57.8
Parallax 64.8
36% 55.6 fps
MRender 59.3
Gravity 46.3
Splatting 48.7
42% 51.4 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP M700 240GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0817B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 161 75 59 63 53 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.2% Above average
Read 256
Write 229
Mixed 235
SusWrite 106
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 25.3
91% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 28.5
66% 137 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 105%
Samsung MZ7KM480HMHQ-000MV 480GB
23GB free
Firmware: GXM50M3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 446 445 452 451 453 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 263
Mixed 391
SusWrite 447
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 37.4
127% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 362
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 125%
Seagate ST500DM009 500GB
422GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 129 128 129 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 126
Write 120
Mixed 68
SusWrite 128
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5474-013.A00LF 99U5471-039.A00LF 12GB
1800, 1800 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 10.4
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.8
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TZ75B Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Biostar TZ75B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $424
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $288Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback