Asus PRIME X570-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-PRO  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 10 '20 at 10:13
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Memory 83
1-Core 160
2-Core 316
100% 187 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 1,103
102% 854 Pts
64-Core 2,196
136% 2,196 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Asus(1043 8730) ≥ 4GB; 8gb
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 126
Parallax 132
108% 130 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 118
Splatting 105
106% 134 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 382 385 382 385 311 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 439
Mixed 440
SusWrite 371
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 53.7
178% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 185
139% 187 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 107%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
460GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 383 385 382 384 380 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 440
Mixed 428
SusWrite 383
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 58.9
192% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 185
139% 187 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 112%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
454GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 383 385 383 385 374 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 441
Mixed 444
SusWrite 382
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 55.1
183% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 185
139% 187 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 109%
Great: 129%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
933GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1449 1448 1446 1450 1449 1474 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 1,431
Write 1,582
Mixed 1,086
SusWrite 1,453
313% 1388 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 82.9
292% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 626
DQ Write 911
DQ Mixed 269
343% 602 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 270%
Great: 255%
Hitachi TOURO Mobile 500GB
150GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 54 56 56 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 76.7
Write 76.4
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 55.7
43% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 58%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
6.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 181 175 185 173 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 181
Write 189
Mixed 118
SusWrite 180
226% 167 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.2
218% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 96%
WDC WD10JPVX-60J 1TB
856GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 40 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 40
Write 37.2
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 40.6
51% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 39.4
115% 40.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 36.5
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 109%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-PRO Builds (Compare 5,398 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,202
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback