Asus P9X79 DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '20 at 06:18
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 169
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 425
45% 358 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1338 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
50.2% Above average
Lighting 60.3
Reflection 66.4
Parallax 89.6
49% 72.1 fps
MRender 70.2
Gravity 67.5
Splatting 57.2
52% 65 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 370 380 391 383 397 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 419
Write 379
Mixed 295
SusWrite 371
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 30.9
102% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 316
242% 329 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 124%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
328GB free
Firmware: A3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 133 126 133 130 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 81.7
Write 89.2
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 129
65% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 74%
Maxtor STM3160815AS 160GB
14GB free
Firmware: B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 61.2
Write 64.3
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 40.4
38% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 42%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 750GB
172GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 23.2
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 25.8
34% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 42%
Prolific ATAPI-6 Bridge C 750GB
214GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 94 91 95 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 103
Write 97
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 93.7
116% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 42%
Prolific ATAPI-6 Bridge C 1TB
106GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 15 15 14 15 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 61.2
Write 29.5
Mixed 46
SusWrite 16.4
47% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
114% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KB_8G_D3_1600_C10 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 33
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 8.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 DELUXE Builds (Compare 622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 DELUXE - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $975
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback