Koloe X58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardKoloe X58  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 6.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '20 at 02:24
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5660
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 141
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 460
45% 367 Pts
64-Core 530
33% 530 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 362E) 1GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 16.7
16% 17.2 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 16.6
16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3400620NS 400GB-$179
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.CNK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 26 31 33 32 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 63.3
Write 56.4
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 31.9
36% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18KSF25672PDZ1G4F1 18KSF25672PDZ1G4F1 18KSF25672PDZ1G4F1 MXIC 25L8005 39GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.8% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 11.1
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.4
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Koloe X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback