Asus K43SD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus K43SD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K43SD
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '20 at 06:57
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 89
1-Core 78.9
2-Core 133
63% 100 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 187
22% 173 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Asus(1043 1652) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.16% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.08
Parallax 1.59
2% 2.36 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 4.43
3% 2.98 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.16%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 419 433 411 359 360 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 452
Write 404
Mixed 400
SusWrite 398
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 29
97% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 294
233% 324 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 125%
WDC WD10 EADS-00L5B1 1TB
440GB free, PID 0700
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 28 27 26 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.2% Very poor
Read 30.1
Write 22.4
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 26.8
34% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K43SD Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K43SD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $301
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback