Intel S2600STB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive76.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory160GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 160GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardIntel S2600STB  (all builds)
Memory154.3 GB free of 160 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '20 at 05:45
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4208
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 49.2
1-Core 77.5
2-Core 156
52% 94.2 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 501
45% 381 Pts
64-Core 1374
85% 1374 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel RS3WC080 479GB
70GB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 289 304 309 308 308 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.8% Good
Read 268
Write 303
Mixed 243
SusWrite 302
63% 279 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 27.8
95% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 213
168% 237 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 76%
Intel RS3WC080 479GB
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 329 327 326 330 328 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.9% Very good
Read 333
Write 309
Mixed 313
SusWrite 328
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 30.7
104% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 212
168% 239 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 76%
WD Red 10TB (2017)-$419
9TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 185 191 199 201 197 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 59% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965698-001.A00G 9965698-001.A00G 9965698-001.A00G 9965698-001.A00G 9965698-001.A00G 9965698-001.A00G 9965698-012.A00G 9965698-012.A00G 9965698-012.A00G King... 160GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.6% Very good
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 27.9
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S2600STB Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO

Motherboard: Intel S2600STB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback