Asus P8Z77-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics68.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '20 at 03:37
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 115
2-Core 229
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 371
46% 348 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.7% Good
Lighting 88.2
Reflection 82.3
Parallax 78.1
72% 82.9 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 79
Splatting 45.9
62% 81.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 108 103 103 106 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 187
Write 101
Mixed 130
SusWrite 102
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 13.8
66% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 69.4
DQ Mixed 64
58% 88.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 48%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
671GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 111 113 114 113 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 29.5
Write 39.5
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 112
42% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 85%
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 180 201 226 227 224 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 68% Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.6% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.2
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 14.4
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-M Builds (Compare 1,294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback