HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '17 at 06:56
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 72.2
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 140
57% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 199
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Asus(1043 0432) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Lighting 34
Reflection 32
Parallax 46.8
28% 37.6 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 29.5
Splatting 36.6
26% 31 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
554GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 108
Write 98.4
Mixed 96.1
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.34
84% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 62%
Seagate USB 2.0 Cable 8GB
1GB free, PID 5020
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 32.5
Write 19.4
Mixed 23
30% 25 MB/s
4K Read 6.56
4K Write 3.72
4K Mixed 2.05
220% 4.11 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AD80AD80 HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 2C802C80 8KTF25664AZ-1G4M1 HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 2C802C80 8KTF25664AZ-1G4M1 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.5% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 14
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback