ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo Lenovo G580

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Lenovo Lenovo G580 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO INVALID
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130314
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	May 08 '20 at 23:48
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	57% Above average	Memory 80.7 1-Core 82.3 2-Core 138 61% 100 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 185 26% 191 Pts	64-Core 162 10% 162 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M 7,774 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 3901) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.3% Terrible	Lighting 4.03 Reflection 4.73 Parallax 3.38 3% 4.05 fps	MRender 5.81 Gravity 4.07 Splatting 2.91 3% 4.26 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.3% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90 17,487 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 227 172 169 166 166 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 396 Write 294 Mixed 306 SusWrite 178 66% 294 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 41.8 4K Mixed 27.2 86% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 102 106% 177 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 105%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB 106 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 120GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 54 54 54 54 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Read 74.2 Write 62.5 Mixed 43 SusWrite 52.8 76% 58.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 45%
SDXC Card 64GB 12,175 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 12GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 30 29 29 25 23 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 25.5 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 26.9 35% 27 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.1 80% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 41%
WDC WD10 EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 127GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 54 54 54 54 54 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	26.1% Poor	Read 60.5 Write 50.8 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 53.5 72% 53.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 27%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3170ME68F9F1600 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.6% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 15.3 38% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 79.2 50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Lenovo G580 Builds (Compare 305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo Lenovo G580

CPU
Pentium B950IntelBench 43%, 7,305 samples	117x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	80x
Core i3-2370MIntel $272Bench 49%, 10,169 samples	21x

GPU
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	132x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	107x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	32x

SSD
eMLC NGFF 507GBMicronBench 75%, 174 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
eMLC NGFF 512GBToshibaBench 82%, 181 samples	9x

RAM
RMT3150ED58E8W1600 2x2GBRamaxelBench 42%, 256 samples	58x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 33%, 8,194 samples	36x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback