Csl-computer A0000001

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemCsl-computer A0000001  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190830
Uptime7.7 Days
Run DateMay 08 '20 at 17:27
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 238
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 642
62% 512 Pts
64-Core 630
39% 630 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 30.8
18% 22.2 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 25.7
Splatting 21.6
17% 20 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 32 56 39 63 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 100
Write 290
Mixed 20
SusWrite 57.9
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 16.9
90% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 12.3
62% 137 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 86%
MD05000-ALDW-RO 500GB
212GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 59 59 62 61 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 61.3
Write 3.3
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 55.1
27% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 27.3
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 24.1
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A0000001 Builds (Compare 1,734 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

System: Csl-computer A0000001

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback