HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 216C
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131121
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 08 '20 at 08:46
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-4655M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
42.5% Average
Memory 64.2
1-Core 47.3
2-Core 75.5
41% 62.3 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 122
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual Graphics
HP(103C 216C) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 12.102.4.6000
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
1.44% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 5.58
Parallax 4.44
0% 3.37 fps
MRender 4.33
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.81 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.44%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
490GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 96 96 98 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 92.4
Write 77.6
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 96.4
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.4% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 8.2
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 4,265 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback