Asus P6T DELUXE V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P6T DELUXE V2  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100308
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 07 '20 at 23:48
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 965-$1,244
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 77.1
2-Core 142
65% 104 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 379
40% 320 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 53.2
Parallax 46.8
9% 37.1 fps
MRender 43.3
Gravity 49
Splatting 47.7
38% 46.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SiImage 240GB
70GB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 223 217 218 206 227 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 408
Write 247
Mixed 272
SusWrite 218
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 28.3
95% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 240
188% 262 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 46 48 42 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 166
Write 175
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 44.7
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.5
182% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 112%
WL1000GSA1672C 1TB
235GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 61
Write 59.9
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 38
38% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 45%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
273GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 57 57 56 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 48.7
Write 51.7
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 56.4
37% 49.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 116 115 116 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 127
Write 119
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 115
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 96%
WD My Passport Essential USB 3.0 500GB
465GB free, PID 0730
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 27.2
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 26.8
36% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
38.9% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 12.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T DELUXE V2 Builds (Compare 1,044 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T DELUXE V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $306
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback