Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Extreme X9650-$850 3,122 User benchmarks, average bench 53% SOCKET775 M/B, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Memory 76.2 1-Core 43 2-Core 83.5 45% 67.6 Pts	4-Core 169 8-Core 171 23% 170 Pts	64-Core 171 11% 171 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250 11,945 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Sapphire(174B 2600) 1.8GB Ram: 1.8GB, Driver: 341.74 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	6.36% Terrible	Lighting 8.5 Reflection 7.65 Parallax 3.69 7% 6.61 fps	MRender 7.76 Gravity 6.3 Splatting 5.61 5% 6.56 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.36% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvidia MIRROR 465.76G 500GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 435GB free (System drive) SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 29 56 62 56 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 68.8 Write 72.1 Mixed 50.6 SusWrite 50 45% 60.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 4.2 15% 5.23 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 5.3 17% 5.9 GB/s	Latency 87.8 46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	5x
Core2 Quad Q9500IntelBench 48%, 5,111 samples	1x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	1x

GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	2x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	1x
HD 7870AMD $203Bench 26%, 42,130 samples	1x

SSD
750 EVO 250GBSamsung $130Bench 94%, 75,831 samples	1x
SUV400S3712 120GBKingstonBench 34%, 503 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	9x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x

Value: 36% - Below average

Total price: $291