Packard EasyNote TE11HC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard EasyNote TE11HC  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard EG50_HC_CR
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130117
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 07 '20 at 20:47
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User MOZ-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
41.4% Average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 31.5
2-Core 51.2
35% 49.4 Pts
4-Core 95.6
8-Core 206
18% 151 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 064B) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.19% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 1.69
2% 3.13 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 4.57
3% 3.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.19%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
459GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 21 47 45 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 61
Write 52.8
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 39.4
36% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8A-PB HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.8
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TE11HC Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TE11HC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback