Asrock 970 Performance/3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	86.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Performance/3.1 (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160126
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 07 '20 at 13:20
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9590-$298 26,109 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 60.7 2-Core 113 56% 87.8 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 303 28% 236 Pts	64-Core 321 20% 321 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$245 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	86.9% Excellent	Lighting 105 Reflection 126 Parallax 127 86% 119 fps	MRender 106 Gravity 121 Splatting 101 89% 110 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SP580 120GB 3,644 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03040014 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 431 Write 324 Mixed 292 77% 349 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 45.9 4K Mixed 30.5 102% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 114 91% 127 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 179GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 129 124 129 129 131 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 135 Write 136 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 127 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 113%
Hitachi HDS721050DLE630 500GB 10,673 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 437GB free Firmware: MS1OA650 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 141 140 140 143 143 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Read 157 Write 144 Mixed 31 SusWrite 141 85% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GB 9,036 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	43.3% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 14.2 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 10.8 25% 8.73 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Performance/3.1 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Performance/3.1

CPU
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	3x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	3x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	2x
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
Premier SP550 240GBAdata $74Bench 79%, 29,295 samples	2x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
Savage 240GBHyperX $120Bench 89%, 39,518 samples	1x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 55%, 3,028 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 9,036 samples	1x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 3,428 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $570

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16