HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130816
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 06 '20 at 22:31
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Memory 62.4
1-Core 54.2
2-Core 92
44% 69.5 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 95
13% 97.5 Pts
64-Core 99.6
6% 99.6 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7540D
HP(103C 1850) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1001
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
3.26% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 4.19
Parallax 3.41
3% 3.87 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 2.93
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.88 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.26%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-128 128GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 139 78 78 79 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 423
Write 281
Mixed 320
SusWrite 128
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 29.3
115% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 166
132% 185 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 86%
Hitachi HDS721016CLA382 160GB
148GB free
Firmware: JPEOA3BF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 76 77 76 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 76.2
Write 71
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 75.9
49% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
S M K K 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.4% Poor
MC Read 12
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback