Gigabyte GA-AORUS X7YV8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics97.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGIGABYTE AORUS X7 DT V8
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AORUS X7YV8  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180426
Uptime15.8 Days
Run DateMay 06 '20 at 20:17
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8850H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 128
2-Core 260
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 730
77% 617 Pts
64-Core 928
57% 928 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Gigabyte(1458 376E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.7% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 138
Parallax 129
101% 130 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 124
Splatting 102
90% 112 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,354
Write 2,172
Mixed 1,053
343% 1526 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 67.9
222% 77.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,174
DQ Write 980
DQ Mixed 1031
785% 1,062 MB/s
Poor: 215% Great: 425%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
899GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 120 120 123 117 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 137
Write 119
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 119
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TN48G26S819-SB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 26.9
90% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 26.9
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AORUS X7YV8 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AORUS X7YV8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback