Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive20.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '20 at 12:56
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 229
75% 137 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 735
71% 585 Pts
64-Core 1,235
76% 1,235 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
MSI(1462 3816) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 115
Parallax 236
111% 163 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 137
Splatting 162
116% 138 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 110%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 69 72 73 91 140 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.9% Poor
Read 116
Write 53.2
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 87.2
18% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 6.1
26% 9.2 MB/s
DQ Read 70.6
DQ Write 66.3
DQ Mixed 76.1
55% 71 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 88%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$60
303GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 147 147 145 146 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 104
Write 110
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 146
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 96%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB
194GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 27.2
Write 23.5
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 34.8
37% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15%
Great: 74%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA400 4TB
260GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 5.5
Write 5.2
6% 5.35 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 72%
ST6000VN 0033-2EE110 6TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 17.3
Write 10
Mixed 10.7
15% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
61% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 93%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
169GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.4 5.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.03% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 27.3
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 4.6
24% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
59% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 7.03%
Great: 54%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
369GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
5.26% Terrible
Read 12.5
Write 28.5
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 0
23% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 5.26%
Great: 62%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
354GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
8.09% Terrible
Read 25.8
Write 24
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 0
23% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
65% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.09%
Great: 62%
WDC WD30 EZRX-22D8PB0 3TB
541GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.27% Terrible
Read 8.7
Write 12.5
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 0
10% 7.48 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 6.27%
Great: 54%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
757GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.5% Terrible
Read 26
Write 22.7
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 0
22% 17.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2666 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
72.4% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 25.5
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 21
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,097 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $445
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback