Acer Aspire TC-865

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-865  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-865
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 06 '20 at 11:13
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 116
2-Core 210
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 457
60% 452 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
Acer(1025 1238) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.05% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 7.19
6% 8.47 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 6.43
Splatting 15.3
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.05%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
882GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 157 105 139 155 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 190
Mixed 39
SusWrite 145
101% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 107%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.9 5.7 5.7 5.8 6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 36.9
Write 38.2
Mixed 34.4
SusWrite 5.8
22% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 94%
Jmicron Generic DISK03 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.8 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 35.9
Write 24.3
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 5.8
18% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 102%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.8 5.7 5.7 5.8 5.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 36.1
Write 24.4
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 5.7
18% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 78%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 2TB
686GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.9 5.6 5.8 5.8 6.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 35.9
Write 38.1
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 5.9
21% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 87%
HITACHI HUA723030ALA640 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.1 2.1 2 2.1 2.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.36% Terrible
Read 33.4
Write 6.7
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 2
14% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
48% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.36%
Great: 8%
ST330006 51AS 3TB
3TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 15 15 16 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 33.6
Mixed 26.9
SusWrite 15.7
36% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 25.2
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 25.4
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-865 Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-865

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $194
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback