TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP ZBook 15

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ZBook 15  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1909
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140813
Uptime20.9 Days
Run DateMay 05 '20 at 09:48
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 191
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 507
55% 438 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 73.7%
 Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 1909) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.72% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 4.38
Parallax 6.5
3% 4.93 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.61
5% 5.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 3.72%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LMT-256L9M-41 MSATA 256GB SED
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6M8410C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 373 349 366 378 381 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 459
Write 374
Mixed 279
SusWrite 368
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 26.8
97% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 199
186% 287 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 85.4%
 Great: 97%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
466GB free
Firmware: GH2OA910
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 117 120 118 118 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 104
Write 106
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 119
64% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 63.8%
 Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
37.7% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 10.5
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 37.7%
 Great: 46%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ZBook 15 Builds (Compare 421 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15

CPU
Core i7-4800MQIntel  $150Bench 63%, 22,632 samples229x
Core i7-4700MQIntel  $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples85x
Core i7-4900MQIntel  $110Bench 68%, 5,651 samples42x
GPU
Quadro K2100MNvidiaBench 7%, 6,539 samples156x
Quadro K1100MNvidiaBench 5%, 5,195 samples119x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples106x
SSD
MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 85%, 3,736 samples17x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples16x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples13x
RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples42x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples20x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples15x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback