Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990XA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 05 '20 at 08:35
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 85
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 147
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 331
38% 293 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Lighting 70
Reflection 77
Parallax 74.9
57% 74 fps
MRender 72.9
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 72.7
59% 72.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 481
Write 443
Mixed 364
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 45.2
149% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 211
157% 209 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
175GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 313 312 317 312 313 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 443
Mixed 438
SusWrite 331
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 44.7
145% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 171
138% 196 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
124GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 181 185 184 184 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 138
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 182
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 112%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70
187GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 98 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 105
Write 70.7
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 98.3
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
205% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
120GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 137 136 137 137 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80% Very good
Read 141
Write 140
Mixed 95.5
SusWrite 137
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80%
Great: 109%
Samsung SSD 860 QVO 1TB
35GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 182 179 85 83 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 232
Write 181
Mixed 180
SusWrite 132
236% 181 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 32.8
2,789% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 31
DQ Write 62.4
DQ Mixed 39.4
3,578% 44.3 MB/s
Poor: 204%
This bench: 211%
Great: 331%
WD My Passport 0830 2TB
62GB free, PID 0830
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 81
Write 79.8
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 49.6
82% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 43%
Samsung SSD 860 QVO 1TB
604GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 142 140 144 144 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 156
Mixed 121
SusWrite 143
200% 152 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 32.2
2,766% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 61.7
DQ Mixed 37.3
3,474% 42.6 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 207%
Great: 227%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A 99U5474-028.A 9905471-006.A 9905474-060.A 16GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.7% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.5
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990XA-UD3 Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback