Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '17 at 02:28
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 72.6
2-Core 148
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 453
45% 369 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Gigabyte(1458 352A) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 22.4
Parallax 17
16% 19.5 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 22.4
19% 22.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 497
Write 385
Mixed 407
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 18.2
99% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 51.5
DQ Mixed 18.5
33% 67.4 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
78GB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 106
Write 93.4
Mixed 89.7
72% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.26
85% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 99U5403-078.A00LF 99U5403-078.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.2% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 14.3
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 11.9
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback